Opinion

Archives

Advertise

Links

Video

RENT
THIS
SPACE

SUPPORT THIS
SITE

YOUR MESSAGE HERE

ADVERTISE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

YOUR
MESSAGE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

ADVERTISE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

SELL
YOUR
PRODUCT
HERE

PROMOTE
YOUR
SITE
HERE

PROMOTE
YOUR
BOOK
HERE

SUPPORT THIS
SITE

YOUR MESSAGE HERE

ADVERTISE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

YOUR
MESSAGE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

ADVERTISE
HERE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

RENT
THIS
SPACE

SELL
YOUR
PRODUCT
HERE

PROMOTE
YOUR
SITE
HERE

PROMOTE
YOUR
BOOK
HERE

RENT THIS SPACE

"One wonders whether he has confused his summertime reading with parliamentary briefing papers," said one diplomat."

Sky News did feature Meacher yesterday in its reports but confined itself to saying that he was accusing the US of going after the oil in the Middle East. Murdoch doesn't seem to think it necessary to give the facts to the public about the standing down of fighter jets on 9/11.

Clare Short has come out fighting today. An article also in the Telegraph today begins:

"Blair's 'abuse of power' led to Kelly death, says Short

Clare Short has launched a ferocious attack on Tony Blair, accusing him of an "abuse of power" that drove David Kelly to take his own life.

In the strongest condemnation yet by a senior politician of Mr Blair's role in the events leading to the apparent suicide of the Government weapons expert, Ms Short says that the Prime Minister helped make his life "hell".

The former International Development Secretary, who resigned in May, also accuses Mr Blair of flouting "proper procedure" and "a willingness to be economical with the actuality" in a full-blooded assault on her former colleague."

Short makes a reference to Blair's `abuse of power' and in light of PropagandaMatrix's report that Short "was threatened with death unless she stuck by Blair until the combat in Iraq was declared to be over" her comment has a greater meaning.

To have us believe in Gordon Brown's independence, Brown and Prescott apparently oppose `Blair's ID card plan'. Don't worry though, it will be back on schedule once Brown makes himself comfortable at Number 10.

New footage of the WTC planes has been released. Apparently the man who made the video didn't realise what he had. The New York Times has released a redacted version of the footage, but one of the frames is very intriguing.

I don't even know what to make of the white flash in the middle, but can you see something on the bottom of the plane body that shouldn't be there? I have added an arrow pointing to the object in question.

The NY Times is touting this footage as the only other film in existence which has the first plane, besides the work of the Naudet brothers who were making a film about New York's firefighters.

Here are the shots NYT provided of the first plane. The arrow in the second shot is the work of the NY Times:

Maybe it's just me, but looking at these pictures and the shots from the Naudet footage, the first plane looks too small to be a Boeing 767:

Naudet footage

There is a hypothesis about these two airborne weapons of destruction. Check out `The Incredible 9-11 Evidence We've All Been Overlooking'.

Blair and Hoon should quit, according to a new poll run by YouGov on behalf of the Mail on Sunday. Speaks for itself.

Following Abu Mazen's resignation and the Israeli targetting of Sheikh Yassin who vows revenge, the news is declaring that the Roadmap peace process is finished. If you've been following Barry Chamish's work, you'll be aware of his analysis that the Roadmap was destined not to work and that the Oslo accord was flawed from the start, to say the least. As if Israel couldn't do enough to make problems worse, now they're calling for Arafat to be expelled.

London today experienced a mock chemical attack on the London Underground to train the emergency services and acclimatize all of us to the idea that we are vulnerable to such happenings. If/when there is a chemical or biological attack, we won't find it such a surprise, thanks to today's activities. Preparation. Gotta love it.

According to Skolnick, the US Military want to take Bush out of the game. Bush is due to make a statement tonight on American television, where he is expected to announce that other countries will help with body-count in Iraq. Will this be enough to placate the irate US armed forces?"

- Editor

Meacher sparks fury over claims on September 11 and Iraq war

The front page story discusses Meacher's accusations in an almost full-page comment article within the newspaper where he says that 9/11 should have been prevented and that the war on terrorism and in Iraq is a smokescreen for the seizure of worldwide hydrocarbons by the west.

To Mr Meacher, I say well done and kudos for having the guts to go against so-called received wisdom about such issues.

Given that this was a front-page story in today's Guardian, I think this will have legs. I don't think it will be a hit-and-run effort, but rather this could actually be the beginning of the downfall of the nutcases driving western policy. It is the first serious break into front-page headlines of the notion that we are being seriously mislead about 9/11 as well as Gulf War II. 

Until June of this year, Meacher was a Minister for the Environment and thus was closer to Blair than rank and file Labour MP's. He was reshuffled out of government  (sacked) for his opposition to Blair's enthusiasm for GM crops.

It seems that Mr Meacher has again expressed his conscience publicly and in doing so has served the public more than his colleagues or the media would care to admit.

The last paragraph of his comment piece reads:

"The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the "global war on terrorism" has all the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda - the US goal of world command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project. Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this project really a proper aspiration for British foreign policy? If there was ever need to justify a more objective British stance, driven by our own independent goals, this whole depressing saga surely provides all the evidence needed for a radical change of course."

Today is a wonderful day for information warriors. A former minister coming out and saying what a lot of us have known for a while gives us credibility and fuel to further our argument.

Those of you who wish to drop Mr Meacher a note of support can contact him at

meacherm@parliament.uk

Expect him to get hate mail over this, so words of encouragement I'm sure would be appreciated.

Meacher was interviewed on the BBC's Today Programme this morning. The only way James Naughtie tries to get the Bush administration off the hook is by claiming that neither Colin Powell nor Dick Cheney are backers of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). You can hear the interview by clicking on the link below. As you listen, you might want to have a look at the names at the bottom of PNAC's statement of principles. The whole statement is quite chilling to read in light of Mr Meacher's analysis.

The BBC seem to be entertaining Mr Meacher's views this weekend. Appearing on BBC News 24 at around 5:30 this afternoon. Mr Meacher was effectively given as long as he wanted to put forward his viewpoint, without interruption. Whilst Peter Sissons trotted out the `conspiracy theory' label, Mr Meacher dodged this beautifully and stated the case for US prior knowledge and possible military stand-down on 9/11, drawing PNAC in at the same time."

- Editor

Hasn't he got strong control over his aides, or as I speculate is he nothing more than a front-man for the policies of the cabal running the world? As a barrister, Hoon knows that he can't fight this, the evidence has been put out there and then spun to ensure his demise. Just as long as enough scalps are had in the Kelly affair, Blair knows that he can keep his reputation intact. It makes it look like he's making people accountable whilst shifting the blame from himself. The whole Inquiry is stage-managed though. Nothing is an accident. This is just a show-trial for public consumption. Blair didn't really need to have an inquiry, so the fact that it is going on with Hutton leading it is indicative of the fact that they are managing everything behind the scenes.

Hutton himself has form. He ruled that David Shayler could not argue that he was acting in the public interest by revealing the British plan to bump off Colonel Gadaffi. So he's hardly independent.

The Guardian today reports:
"Tony Blair's repeated assertion to Lord Hutton that intelligence chiefs fully controlled the content of the September 2002 dossier was questioned yesterday by a government document which said No 10 had "ownership"."

So the facts are beginning to emerge in black and white for those who couldn't see the forest for the trees. Watch and see - they'll point to Campbell's departure as closure of this particular nugget. "It wasn't us, it was Campbell. He's gone, so what's the fuss?". Never mind the fact that he's helping to craft the new spin setup for Blair.

I'm becoming more convinced that Howard Dean will be tipped as the likely Democratic presidential candidate in the US. A few weeks ago, the BBC and other UK news organisations started  doing stories on `who is Howard Dean?' They didn't have to do this, and they certainly did do pieces on `who is Lyndon LaRouche?' or `who is Dennis Kucinich?'. So they're setting the stage for it being no surprise that this guy Howard Dean wins the nomination.

As for California and the Arnie maneuverings, well I really don't know. The fact that he met recently with Warren Buffett and the Rothschilds would indicate that he is the anointed one for Governorship of California. Little mention of his pro-Nazi leanings in the US press - maybe this has something to do with the millions of dollars he gave to the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Meanwhile Mel Gibson suffers flak from all sides and especially the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for making a film based on the bible. Oh dear.

For those of you who are interested, I have been told by the company I work for that they'll pay for last week's cab fare. I'm still waiting for the claim form though. I was told by everyone else in the firm that `they'll never pay'. I'm hoping that they'll keep to their word.

Blair is shaking up the Downing Street press operation, and apparently there will be daily televised briefings whereas they had previously been held to some extent off the record. I don't know if this is good or bad. It gives a lovely opportunity to Downing Street to have face-time on camera and say what THEY want to say, without it being interfered with by the journalists. On the other hand, it does mean that everything they say will be well and truly on the record. I have a feeling though that they'll get as slick with these televised briefings as Ari Fleischer was for the White House briefings. Anyone who asks awkward questions will no doubt have their press pass revoked. Freedom of the press? Pah!

Our own Prince of Darkness, Peter Mandelson has been advising on the new set-up, along with the recently resigned Campbell. You can be sure it will be a slick operation. There will no departure from the use of spin to further the cabal's objectives. On the subject of Mandelson, remember that when they fingered Pete Townshend from `The Who' for downloading child porn, they also had two senior Labour figures on the list. Could Mandelson be one of them? Of course this is pure speculation, but he is openly gay, strange and very close to Blair. Who might the other figure be? Some say that Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown only married for convenience. One thing is for sure though, what you hear from the press is purely for public consumption. After all, do you really think that everything that happens in the world is printed in the newspapers? As if... 

I am hearing more from level-headed people who don't go in for so-called `conspiracy theories' who don't believe for a second that Dr David Kelly committed suicide. Even these down-to-earth folks say that the government murdered him. It's nice to know that people can see through the nonsense perpetuated by Blair, Hutton, civil servants and especially the media. If the Kelly affair does actually blow things wide open, there may be a chance to capitalise on it by disseminating the real information on 9/11.

There are others however who pay no attention to the day-to-day headlines emanating from the probe into Kelly's death. I have heard people say `what difference does it make?' This indicates that there are some who would let whatever goes on in the world just wash over them unless they are personally affected in a major way. These people can be dangerous, because they will say that there is nothing wrong with draconian legislation so long as you have nothing to hide. Whatever happened to freedom? It was this attitude that helped usher in Hitler's police state.

I've added a couple of syndicated headline services in the right-hand bar of this site. I can only update the site once a day while I am working, so the news from BuzzFlash and the News Insider will at least provide some up-to-date news, even if it is US-centric. Anyone know of a similar service that covers UK headlines?

I guess that's it for today. Roll on the weekend"

- Editor

My MP won't read it though, because I apparently promised to supply a summary of the evidence. So they're telling me I broke my promise. In response I pointed out that Labour has broken numerous promises to the British electorate, but rather than argue, I suggested that Barry Gardiner skim-read it by following the material that I had highlighted.

They're not interested. No-one is interested. At least, not in the Palace of Westminster it seems. Would a 2-page summary have sufficed for the war in Iraq? For the notion that Dr Kelly killed himself? For the Scott Inquiry into arms to Iraq? I think not. For such a major issue, they want it all boiled down to sound-bites, so that they can then argue back with the same. This is in part as a result of spin reducing the attention span, but it is also indicative of the fact that democracy is dead here. Don't kid yourselves that British politicians can make a difference, unless it's in the favour of big business or the banks.

I had an interesting conversation with a Mason I know. He said that he had heard the rumblings in the lodge that Dr Kelly was bumped off and therefore he obviously doesn't buy the crap in the news. He also knew from the outset that Roberto Calvi was murdered 21 years ago, but he suggested that it was MI5 or MI6 acting as proxy for the Italians. I had suspected as much myself.

We have the Scotsman reminding the world that the Bin Laden family were flown out of the US immediately after the 9/11 attacks while all other flights were grounded. Those who have followed the news keenly will already know this, but the fact that it's back in the news would suggest that someone is playing a hand at pulling Bush down.

Joseph Farah of World Net Daily has pointed out in his G2 briefing that the cause of both the London and US power cuts has not been determined yet and thus the instant statements that they were not the result of terrorism were premature. "International intelligence sources are skeptical that the major unexplained power outages in the United Kingdom and United States occurred within weeks of each other by mere coincidence." These experts are not saying it WAS terrorism but they aren't ruling it out either. They suggest it could have been sabotage. But this shows that the officials make statements when they can't possibly be based on any knowledge of fact.

I'll have to watch what I carry on this website. If my timing is right, Sherman Austin has already turned himself in to spend a year behind bars for carrying information on his website about building a bomb. The whole thing was trumped up, and as he said, it is to set an example to the rest of us. Link to the full article below.

Jonathan Pollard appeared before a judge in the US to try and get the early release deal he says he was promised. There is far more to this than the mainstream would let you know. Israel did a deal with the US government to secure an early release for Pollard. In exchange for some information, the US would let him go. Israel kept its end of the bargain, but the US reneged.

The information supplied? The codes for the Libyan air defense system. The US used these in 1986 to bomb Tripoli. The complete subordination of the Libyan system by the Americans meant that missiles fired in the air at US fighter jets fell back to earth on the Libyans. In the end, the system was turned off allowing a clear run for the Yanks. This is the real story behind the Pollard affair and again you won't read about it in the newspapers. 

The first phase of the Hutton Inquiry into Dr Kelly's death draws to an end today. The BBC reports "Another of Dr Kelly's friends, journalist Tom Mangold, told the inquiry the scientist had thought the claim Iraq could deploy weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes was "risible".

As I have previously stated, the evidence is there to have Blair and his whole team up for lying, getting us into an illegal war and blatant obfuscation. And possibly the murder of a government scientist who was becoming a distraction from their message.

Not that Kelly alone is a distraction. They keep trying to tell us how wonderful they are for the Iraqi people, despite all the shootings, nervousness and bombings going on in the middle east. If the US and the British did not plan in advance to restore the services they bombed to smithereens (electricity, water, sewage etc) then one must conclude that their policy was to sew discord in the area.

London is apparently on high terror alert. I think this is just for the news, because I haven't seen any evidence of this whatsoever on my daily travels into the City of London. I suppose they'll roll out the tanks for television like they did at Heathrow airport to try and convince us that we need a police state to protect us from the terrorists. Orwell was a prophet. The similarities between 1930's Germany and the UK as well as the US are simply uncanny. 

There's so much I want to talk about today, but as usual I don't have the time. The need to go out and earn a few pennies outweighs the desire to make this website what I would really like it to be.

For those of you who are interested in obtaining a copy of Paul Joseph Watson's book  `Order  Out Of Chaos', I will be selling it on this site shortly. I'm just waiting for the delivery. So if you want to pre-order your copy, send me an email and you'll be first on the reserved list. If there are other books you'd like to see stocked here, please send me an email and let me know."

-Editor

Wednesday morning

How about Propaganda Matrix's scoop:

"I'm a reader from Glasgow, Scotland in the United Kingdom. I'm a journalist and stand-up comedian and heard some bits and pieces from a BBC reporter who was on Tony Blair's far-east tour plane following Kelly's death.

A conversation was overheard by this BBC reporter between Tony Blair and his press secretary Alistair Campbell. The conversation was heard folowing the press conference when Blair was asked if he had Dr Kelly's blood on his hands and Blair froze and didn't answer.

Campbell, a notorious ranter was heard to say: "What the fuck was that, you know the line on this, what were you doing, why didn't you answer." Blair's response was inaudible and Campbell was then heard to say: "This is what you wanted, you asked for this so play the game Tony." Since then Blair continually trotted out the line about waiting for the Inquiry before commenting.

Normally in the UK Public Inquiries take months and months before they start but this one was pushed through quickly because Tony Blair is apparantly on the verge of cracking. Campbell needs to get this over and done with ASAP and then have Chancellor Gordon Brown installed as Prime Minister before the end of the Year and give him plenty of time to get the people on his side before the 2005 elections.

Secondly a contact of mine, a former MI6 spook, was speaking about the circumstances of Kelly's death. He said he's been taught how to "make anything look like anything" and said that there must have been some kind of struggle at the scene of Kelly's death. He said it was sloppy work that Kelly's body was found with enough pills for an overdose but hadn't ingested them, he said that should have been removed from the scene under normal procedure. He added "You can slit someone's wrists and make it look like suicide easily but it's a lot harder to make someone swallow tablets." He also said the heart monitor pads found on Kelly's chest were "simply there to make sure he was dead." He also said those should have been removed and suspects the agents involved were disturbed by someone in the process of the killing.

I just thought some of this shit might have been interesting to yourselves. I'm happy to contribute occasional pieces of information every now and then but I'd rather you didn't publish my name along with anything I send you.."

Golly gosh gee whizz. The whole affair is making more sense. The email also ties in with my prediction that they'll let Blair gracefully step down from No. 10 after the Hutton Inquiry with his reputation intact. Then he'll be free to tag team with Clinton; Blair as President of the EU and Clinton as Secretary General of the UN. What a combination.

Yesterday also saw testimony from one of the paramedics who attended to Dr Kelly's body and who tells us that there was not enough blood present for the wrist cut to have been an arterial wound.

To ram home the idea that Kelly committed suicide, they had an `expert on suicide' testify to explain why Kelly would have done himself in.

This morning's revelations include the fact that Kelly had apparently ingested 30 co-proxamol tablets, as well as the release of his last emails where he talks about wanting to go back to Iraq and waiting until the end of the week to make a decision. Thursday is not the end of the week, but he disappeared on a Thursday. This story is full of holes, but not quite as clear-cut as the garbage pushed as the explanation for the success of the 9/11 attacks.

Just pay no attention to the fact that Kelly's own doctor testified that he had not prescribed co-proxamol.

Today, Assistant Chief Constable Michael Page told the inquiry "I remain confident that he met his death at his own hand."

How many of you guys are thinking about all of this? Probably all of you, which would be why you are here. Feel sorry for the people who believe the crap in the newspapers."

- Editor

PropagandaMatrix:
Former MI6 Agent: Kelly Murder Was 'Sloppy Work'

Featured Articles

They're Coming To Take Me Away (Ha ha!)

Other News

Iran relations unchanged, says Foreign Office