| "I
have received several emails from readers about the pictures posted
yesterday.
Here are
some extracts:
"When looking at the
pictures Mr Spencer's argument sounds convincing,however what concerns
me is this. If Mr Spencer is correct then what happened to the boeing
767's and their passengers. Unles I went dyslexic and missed a part of
the article Mr Spencer did not offer any plausible theories as to
where these planes and their passengeers went to.
LC"
"I processed the image of the
plane that looks like it has an anomolous attachment to the fuselage.
The first image is an enlargement and uses sharpening filters. The
second rendition is stripped of color with enhanced sharpness and
contrast/brightness.
Something is definitely there that
was not built by the manufacturer.
 
T"
"I agree with your assessment of
the new film. But...
Where did the real
planes go? And the people on them? What about the cell
phone calls from the passengers?
Thanks. Great
job.
CA"
One
reader offered the following analysis of the new pictures:
"i dont know
if you guys created these fakes or you are getting duped by someone.
contrast one of the new pix with one of my original screen captures
from 'the day'
two things jump right out at me.
1) building is already blackened in the new one and pristine in
original
2) flying angle of the aircraft is altogether different, more steep
turn and more pointed downward in the new
W"
My
response:
"Thanks
for your email.
No, I didn't do anything to these pictures. They are from the NY
Times, as the story on my site clearly indicates. If you check out the
link to the NY Times you will see that they are from the new footage
that has been `discovered'.
All I did was take screen grabs from the Shockwave presentation and
post them, adding the big black arrow. That's it.
If you think it's fake, address your anger to the New York Times.
What I will say is that the shot of the second plane appears to be
taken from a different angle to the picture you sent me.
As for the building being blackened, I can't see it. It looks like the
shot has been blown up from VHS camera footage whereas the coverage on
the day would have been broadcast quality.
If you think I've still missed something, please let me know."
W
replied:
"here is the pic i am referring to with the "blackened area" circled and a big arrow pointint to it. this is quick ugly work.
heh
for the record, there is no anger directed at you.
i have my opinions on who did what to who that day and i dont think it was 19 arabs.
i also dont think anyone in the "arab terrorist" world was capable of grounding our air force for nearly 60 minutes that day and the lack of response by them is the worst part of it all.
as for their claims that no-body knew what was going on....
on "der tag" (the day) i lived just south of the entrance to Cheyenne Mountain (NORAD) and passed by on my way to work just as the radio news was reporting the second aircraft attack.
i have no photos and no way to prove it to anyone but the entrance was already "sealed" with hum-vees and at least a squad of light infantry.
somebody knew SOMETHING was going on pretty damn early in the game.
No way to prove it one way or another though.
I didnt even really THINK about it for several weeks.
Like everyone else, I was in shock and buying everything we were being told for quite a long time.
sigh....
W"
Personally
I think that the blackened area is simply an old building in front of
the WTC, and I seem to recall having some photos of the damage done to
it, taken while I was in Manhattan last year.
One
reader offered the following explanation for the white flash:
"I
have a few thoughts about that photo. 1. The bright spot you see inthe
photo is a reflection of a (infrared targeting laser). The camera
that was used to take that photo is most likely sensitive to infrared
radiation. Judging by the size of the beams (spot) I would quess the
laser was stationed about 5 or 7 miles away from the WTC.
The object on the underside of the plane maybe a combination missile
pod/ guidance system.
I've worked with lasers for over 25 years. The word LASER is and
acronymfor L.ight, A.mplification, by S.timulated, E.mission of
R.adiation.
That picture is even more damming to the elite then you can now
imagine.
But not for long.... just watch!
M"
For
reference, here is a picture of a normal Boeing 767, with thanks to UnderReported.com.
Picture
from FlightPix.com
In
response to the common theme of what happened to the planes, readers
may want to digest Professor Kee Dewdney's hypothesis `Operation
Pearl'. [ Click here for
locally cached copy if physics911.org is down]
Without
full disclosure of the full facts of what actually took place on 9/11,
we can only speculate based on the evidence available and by applying
logic to the whole thing. Sadly the mainstream media don't want you to
think about any of this and are training us to respond illogically by
denouncing any speculation as `conspiracy theory'. As former minister
Michael Meacher demonstrated over the weekend, presenting the facts
when this has not previously been done is not the work of a conspiracy
theorist but the legitimate questioning which we should all subject
our governments to.
The
FBI has a track record of lying about terrorist incidents in the USA.
with the 1993
bombing of the World Trade Center being a set-up, covering up the
other players and other explosive devices in the 1995
Oklahoma City Bombing, the missile hit on TWA
Flight 800 over Long Island in 1996 plus a host of other things
that the federal government can't tell the truth about.
So
why should we believe the garbage they've put out about 9/11?
The
official explanation for 9/11 is full of holes, most especially the
notion that they had no prior knowledge or that they didn't envisage
planes being used as colossal missiles. Two articles of interest in
this regard. A Time Magazine report `Bin
Laden Rides Again: Myth vs. Reality' and a BBC
news report about the G8 summit in Genoa, Italy in the summer of
2001. Because of apparent airborne terrorist threats, surface-to-air
missile (SAM) batteries were deployed in the area around the summit.
News reports also informed the public that the whole area was a no-fly
zone.
I
could take a lot of web-space and time shredding the official account
of events on 11th September 2001, but I won't do that. There are
plenty of websites which set out the case; try Google, Infowars
or PropagandaMatrix.
Some
may argue that there couldn't possibly be a cover-up because there
would be too many people involved and the media would have told us
about it. Really? Who is responsible for perpetuating the myths about
the Gulf
War, the '93 WTC bombing, OK City, TWA flight 800? The media. By
unquestioningly repeating the lies of government and failing to
examine the obvious evidence contradicting the official line, the
media are either wittingly or unwittingly helping to brainwash the
public. This is amply demonstrated by the fact that many Americans
believe Saddam
had a hand in 9/11 and this is purely due to ridiculous news
coverage by the monopoly US press.
For
an example of journalists not asking tough questions, how about CBS
News anchor Dan (JFK)
Rather in
his own words on the difficulties he faces in the US since 9/11.
This
week sees the second anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Of course there
will be a lot of patriotic activity in the US as well as the broadcast
of the truly Stalinist propaganda movie DC
9/11: Time of Crisis which by all accounts has re-written history
and sewn a few subliminal seeds with nuggets here and there. Meanwhile
a conference
will be held in Germany for those who doubt the official story,
attended by Michael Ruppert of From
the Wilderness and former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney.
The
Times today offers a new revelation
about the death of Dr David Kelly. Sgt Pederson, a US military
linguist who worked with Kelly told a friend "Don’t believe
what you read in the newspapers". What would that
be then? A bogus story about suicide?
Bush
appeared on TV yesterday to rally the American public into
continuing their support for the bloodshed in Iraq and Afghanistan and
asked for billions more dollars to fund it. Will this go down well
considering the huge deficit?
Parroting
Bush's line, the BBC has the cheek to ask `Should
Muslim countries embrace Western style democracy?' The political
set-up in some of these countries is far from perfect, but look where
so-called democracy has got the UK or the USA. It's not just the
concept of voting that they're talking about; they want to export our
`free-trade' practices. In other words the multi-nationals want to run
protection rackets in the middle-east as well as in the west.
More
cage rattling from the CIA's one-time (current?) assets, Al
Qaeda. We are all supposed to worry now about another terrorist
outrage and demand that governments impose a police state to protect
our freedoms (spot the double-think).
Apparently
powerless to act against al-Muhajiroun, the powers that be are
instead giving
them airtime which makes everybody understandably upset when they
hear them hailing the 19 hijackers as the `Magnificent 19'. Are these
guys being run by our beloved government?
Big
Brother is on the march. Police
in the UK want every Briton to hand over a sample of DNA for a
national database. The Telegraph reports that the British
public are in favour of identity cards (nonsense) but balk at the £40
cost; what else would you expect from a newspaper allegedly run by
our own intelligence services a la Conrad Black. Why don't they just ask everyone to sign a blank
sheet of paper to be used for a `confession' at some point in the
future? It won't be long before Labour decides to relocate to a big
pyramid.
More
updates later perhaps."
-
Editor |
