| "I
changed the way I write the date. Did anyone notice? It's for one
day. Just to see if you're on your toes. That's how I hear everyone
refer to this day now, with a more American syntax - "September
eleventh". Either that or "Nine eleven." This day has
become a franchise for those who use it to their advantage.
As I
have the coverage of today's events on the television over my
shoulder, I am saddened to see that the coverage we are getting is of
a wallowing in grief over the events of that day. Also airing with the
most amazing timed release is a new video apparently showing Bin
Laden mountain climbing with his mates, a gun slung over his
shoulder. The message to the public is "He's still out there, and
we need to get him."
Please
don't think that I have no sympathy for those who lost love ones two
years ago. On the contrary, my heart goes out to them. What happened
was terrible and I cannot imagine what they go through every day in
dealing with it. Many of us have had to deal with grief in our lives.
Some deal with it better than others. From my own experience though I
am learning that to continue with a positive attitude towards life one
must try to do positive things to create that reality.
The
reality that we are seeing, at least in the UK, of what we should
apparently be thinking about as far as the `news' is concerned, is
remembering what a terrible day it was two years ago. No doubt seeing
the grief of the families on television will stir emotions with
viewers whilst they are reminded of the false story about the US
didn't see this coming and must retaliate with a `war on terrorism'.
War on freedom is more like it.
This
assault on the viewers mind is appalling. A lot of people in New York
are not working today as I understand it. Are they all at home
watching this coverage on television? Or are they out doing something
with their lives?
When
they say that 9/11 was an attack on the freedoms celebrated in the US
they were right. It continues to be used as an attack on freedom. The
USA Patriot Act and the impending Victory Act are a full-scale assault
on the principles behind the founding of the United States. The
propaganda around 9/11 is like nothing I've ever seen before, but that
may be my youth showing there.
This is
an obvious example of psychological conditioning for the purposes of
those who run the system. They're not covering how people are out
there getting on with their lives, trying to celebrate their freedom.
Whether it be families out playing in the park, someone taking the
time to visit a friend or relative or even people out campaigning for
the truth about 9/11, there has to be people taking a truly positive
attitude today. We don't see any of this on television though.
When
people come home from work and watch the news to find out around the
world today they'll experience a lengthy dose of Americans grieving
and images of the attacks on that day. This will be reinforced with
stories about the conflict in Iraq, tying the two together in their
minds.
The
breaking news right now on both BBC News 24 and Sky News is that there
is a fire at a block of flats in the Nottingham, England. They're
giving extended coverage to the remembrance of the events but no time
to what they would call the `conspiracy theories'. They're not even
mentioning them, never mind with a disparaging growl. Nothing. Maybe
Channel 4 news will do something about the suspicions people have
about the official account of events, but they will have to make out
that all doubters are mentally unwell.
If
you're reading this and you want to know what you can do that's
positive about 9/11?
Switch
off the TV if it's on first of all. Don't let commercial or state
television try to do your thinking for you.
If you
want to be `awkward' you could go out and talk to someone you know
about your doubts over 9/11.
If you
want to be positive for today, go and do something positive. It's
corny, but go for a walk in the park, go visit a relative, send
flowers to someone. I don't know. I'm still waking up after my
graveyard shift at work so forgive the lack of inspiration. But as
they said in the film Dead Poets Society, `Carpe Diem - `Seize the
day'.
I keep
thinking about how we can improve the world around us by sharing
information with people. That is one of the reasons for this site, to
try and convey new information and perspectives to people. I've always
been inquisitive, always asking awkward questions. I don't see many
people doing that these days. Certainly not the journalists we rely on
to tell us what is happening in the world. This is my reason for
wanting to pursue a journalistic career. If you want to do something
positive today you could support my work. I'm looking for sympathetic
advertisers and donations.
The
unprecedented number of hits this website experienced as a result of
the new footage at the World Trade Center lead to a significant number
of downloads of video and audio files. These eat bandwidth and will
push me beyond my monthly allowance, leading to a bill. Your support
keeps this site online and enables the posting of new video and audio
files for download. So far the jar is rather empty, so too speak.
I'm
trying to find ways to be able to make it pay to run this website.
Then I can be your proxy awkward person. I can be that one journalist
that asks our British politicians the questions that other journalists
shy away from. Your support
can help make this happen.
Geoff
Hoon has made a sort of miniscule
apology type statement to the House of Commons, explaining away in
legalise how he was a naughty boy with regard to the dossier on Iraq.
Watching Hoon slip and slide his way out of trouble is liking watching
his greasy gang boss Blair. Both get themselves out of bit holes by
using sematics and plausible deniability. They barely had a case for
attacking Iraq, and anyone who tried to question an n'th
generation `intelligence dossier' was ridiculed because it all came
from `reliable intelligence sources' which turned out to be Alastair
Campbell and the voices in his head, following the directions of his
masters.
They try
to change what we may remember by telling us that the whole report was
toned down and certain references removed. What they don't mention is
how the whole thing was spun so that the country was for a time
convinced that this man Saddam Hussein actually posed a threat to our
security.
Of
course Blair and Bush tell us that Saddam had more than 10 years to
comply with what was required of him, but dropping bombs on Iraq from
the no-fly-zone hardly constitutes pursuing the issue of his apparent
weapons of mass destruction. The decision was made to attack Iraq to
secure the oil, not because Saddam posed some threat. The simple truth
is that the agenda was publicly driven by the `neo-conservatives' in
the USA but no doubt there were others behind the scenes pushing the
same theme but not just in the USA.
The
Swedish foreign minister who was stabbed sadly died earlier
today after several hours in surgery. The news has told us what a
peaceful country Sweden is, where politicians move around with very
little security, not bothered by attention like British or American
politicians. Other than the shooting of Olaf Palme in the 1980's,
there ahs not been anything like this in Sweden. So it's pretty
extreme that Anna Lindh was stabbed to death.
When
something extreme happens, it should be thoroughly investigated. Will
anyone ask whether this could have been a political
murder? I don't know the facts about Swedish politics, but if a
politician was murdered in the UK, we'd want to ask the question if
there was foul play on the part of the authorities. Did Ms Lindh know
too much about something? No doubt this will be used by some to argue
for a clamp-down on the freedoms experienced by Swedes which would be
a tragic use of a tragic event. Events move so fast however that few
people will pay attention to the agendas at work.
As
it's relevant to today, here's the irony that strikes me about the
way the world works. The mainstream media get to brainwash us every
day but a university lecturer gets a
character-assassination for a weblink.
There's
more on the new 9/11 footage and anomalies. Several pages have
been put up at Jeff Rense's website.
People with more expertise than I are attempting to explain what's
wrong with the picture and hopefully this subject will receive the
attention it needs to prove or disprove various hypotheses. As I have
been warned though, don't let it distract too much from the evidence
already out there showing that 9/11 is a fraud on the public for the
purposes of the new world order. I'm happy to hand on the baton, so to
speak, having broken the story about the strange object on this
website.
If there
IS something on that plane that shouldn't be then we have another nail
in the coffin of lies spewed by the US federal government and the
media.
I'll be
keeping an eye on the issue, but I don't want to focus on it too much
lest I be labeled the crazy guy who thinks that planes didn't hit the
World Trade Center. Just because I can voice my views regularly
doesn't mean I necessarily have to. I can play their game to my
advantage too, you know. Too much dwelling on single issues just plays
into the hands of the fraudsters who can make out that Elvis is
sitting on the beach in Monte Carlo sipping champagne with Lord Lucan,
if they chose to do so. Besides, 9/11 is not the only thing I have
views on, but because of the timing, I could hardly avoid discussing
it.
Video
Shows Distinct, Inexplicable Object On Underside of Jet
(Requires
Flash)
AC
Mechanic: Object Should Not Exist
Boeing
Fuselage Anomaly Should NOT Be There
What
Is This On The Bottom Of The Plane?
Mystery
Solved?
If
anyone sees a new link about this, please let
me know.
Topical
cartoons, click to enlarge
Final
word - Bring back `Spitting Image' !"
-Editor |
